Jump to content
Bottled Ship Builder

Pass of Brander


Recommended Posts

272 completed since I started counting in October 1992, but I built a considerable number in the 20 years or so  before that.       Have only kept a small number, as I sell them.    I don't take private commissions, and don't advertise them.   Collectors just ask me what  is available from time to time.   The hobby is self-financing.     A few years ago, I was producing 13 or 14 per year!     

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They certainly do get easier with practice.     I find they also take much longer.     In the 1970s, I could build one in a week, but now, it takes me weeks on end to produce one.    A lot of the reason for this is that I do not work on them every day, and even when I do move myself to start building, some days I will only do half an hour, and other days maybe up to three hours (1 1/2 in the morning, and 1 1/2 in the afternoon).       This is one of the last models I built using wooden masts and spars, and cotton for rigging.   I completed it in about 1972.   The steel barque Afon Alaw.   It does not look very good to me now, but I thought it was great at the time.     Sadly, a very large number of people tell me that it is just as good as what I produce  now, which make me wonder why I bothered trying to improve for all those years if very few could tell the difference!      The colured picture is the Donna Francisca, that a number of people claim is no better than the Afon Alaw!     Bob  

 

Afon Alaw (Medium).jpg

Donna Francisca (Medium).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your older work is very good but yeah there is a big difference between the two.  The spats are more to scale, the lines are smaller and more to scale, the blacks are noticble where before they were not.  There's a lot more to your deck furniture now.  You have come a very long way.

It is funny to me that moat people cant tell the difference.  I've seen it in some of the repair work I've done.  I helped a man in his 80's rig a Constalation which turned out well enough, especially,given the time constraints, but compared to what I was used to seeing from other members in my club like say John McCann, it was severely lacking.  The man and his family didnt know the difference so they were very impressed.

  There's a lot of things that go into a ship that I think the general public just doesn't know about.  Its like looking at a car engine.  For the most part I see pipes and tubes going every which way.  A mechanic will see alternators, carborators, and individual parts.  We see fore stays, back stays, blocks, lifts, running lines.  Regular people just see a lot of rope.  It does beg the question why put the detail if no one will notice?  There's a lot of answers to that.  For the most part its who are you building for?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only build what I feel like building these days, and I am well-aware that most ship modellers do not really like merchant ships.    But I am also building for collectors, of whom a large number prefer miniature merchant ships above anything else, probably because they are scarce.    Some people will notice fine detail where they will not notice glaring errors.     I often find my models being descrbed as "perfect in every detail," but that is not so, because I am far from being a perectionist.        I really haven't the patience to go in for super-detailing such as glazing portholes, or putting doorhandles on.     But I do try to stick to scale  and have fine masts and rigging rather than thick chunky ones and over-sized rigging.     When comparing the two models, you were spot on with these differences.      A model of the Bidston Hill (see below)  that I completed, and sold in the early 1970s for £16, turned up on Ebay recently with a starting price of 99p with no reserve.      I put in a bid for £16 just out of interest.    Eventually, it sold to a buyer in the US for just over £400.     When I contacted him later telling him when, and where I built it, and sending him a photograph of the Donna Francisca, (above), he said it was no better than the Bidston Hill, that he had just purchased!        I have come across a lot of instances like that!    Just can't understand it.   

Bob

 

Bidston Hill Completed 1972.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...